New Hour Record

I work in TV production and at one time I used to actually make the original Guinness ABC Inernational special that filmed people BASE jumping off cliffs and doing outrageous stuff. So if Guinness is the arbiter, bank on the most outrageous stuff garnering the attention. For example, if someone has the sack and athletic skill to peddle a geared uni 30 miles an hour, don’t think that won’t make it into the book, if not onto the cover.

Like I said, you just include an unlimited “geared” catagory in the record business. Someone in average shape might get the record, but don’t expect it to last long. In a matter of a few years there will be hundreds of geared unis out there – of that you may be sure.

JL

JL

What’s the problem with giraffes re/speed records?
A giraffe IS a unicycle… and if someone can break the speed record on a giraffe… more power to them!

I’m not sure that I have the athletic skill, but I’ve definitely got the sack to give it a try… so if someone wants to lend me a geared uni - I would definitely give it my best effort to hit 30MPH… or as close as I can get!

I would be concerned, however, about damaging the uni due to a UPD at high speed… which seems like it would probably be inevitable (at some point during training).

Wow. All this discussion is great! I guess the way to settle things is for everyone to submit their opinions to the IUF. The IUF web site was just modified to allow comments on the upcoming 2006 rules for use in the Switzerland UNICON. Good timing, as by then the geared wheel access issue will be all but gone. If we want to control our own destiny, just like the jugglers, then it’s up to the IUF to adopt new rules and recognize the new wheel sizes and configurations.

Here’s the web page for the Rules Committee:
http://www.unicycling.org/iuf/committee/rulebook/2005/

Vivalargo: I know it’s nothing personal and I don’t take it that way, but I’d say I was in pretty darn good shape, far beyond “average”. I don’t think you really have to worry about someone in “average” shape getting a world record in an exertion category! :smiley:

Just a general comment: technical innovation and sophistication (not the same thing) are essential parts of any bicyclist’s attempt to compete today, let alone go for records. These include use of exotic materials and designs, computer modeling, wind tunnel tests, sophisticated clothing and food, dedicated sports medicine, specialized training machines, multi-location training schedules, multi-person support teams, sponsorship by many companies, and the list goes on.

Saying that a record isn’t meaningful if a person can’t compete on an off-the-shelf single-speed Schwinn bicycle from Wal-Mart is not really relevant.

I don’t mean to say that a category of competition where the unicycle parameters are fixed or limited is not valid. It is valid, just different.

This is similar to sailing, where “single class” races essentially force all competitors to use the same boat setup. The emphasis is on sailing skill, some rigging changes, and race tactics. Yet, the solo around-the-world races and records continue to push the state-of-the-art of sailing technology, computer and communications technology, remote medicine, solo sailing techniques, boat design, and the like.

Hey, Unisk8R:

My comment about fitness was directed not to you, rather to this post:

“Even if access to geared wheels is less limited, it’s still putting an extra price premium on specialized equipment for anyone who wants to challenge it, whereas currently you could just buy a stock coker and challenge pretty much any of the records by training up, so they’re truly records of athleticism and skill, rather than of technology purchasing ability.”

I’m stoked that you went out and got after that record. Perhaps more important, in the long run, than your actual performance, is the fact that you were the first person to go after any record on a geared uni, thus establishing the “unlimited” catagory. And for speed records, make no mistake about it: while folks are peddling themselves stupid on fixed axel rigs (no harm in that), the adventure will be happening in the fast lane, where the geared unis are smoking along at 25+ MPH.

JL

Nothing wrong with giraffes regarding speed records. I just think a giraffe would be a different category than the standard style unicycle where the cranks are in line with the center of the wheel.

If there are going to be two unicycle classes then the classes should be standard unicycles (including the designs like the Schlumpf hub and Pete’s jack shaft drive) and giraffes. And that’s currently the way Guinness considers things.

Defining a giraffe class would require some consensus to define exactly what it means to be a giraffe. How high does it need to be? Can it be geared up? Wheel size?

Stefan Gauler set an hour mark for a giraffe. The info on the record is on his records web page: Meine Einradweltrekorde.

I agree 100%… thanks for clarifying that.

Why limit it to just two classes? I think there should be separate classes for non-geared, geared, and giraffe… so you would essentially have: non-geared standard, geared standard, non-geared giraffe, and geared giraffe. Of couse what about wheel sizes… I suppose you could also have separate classes for each different wheel size!

Wow… that’s really cool! I assume they use comas instead of decimal points in Germany and his average speed was 16.048 KPH, not 16,000 KPH :smiley: ! That’s just a tad under 10 MPH -pretty darn good for a giraffe!

I think I can do better, however, with the technological advantage of my geared giraffe!

Therefore… drawing inspiration from Pete, I will attempt to break Stefan’s record on my geared giraffe at the velodrome in Queens, NY. I will start training ASAP!

Thanks, John… without your bringing this to my attention, I would never have thought to attempt to break such a record… I didn’t even know such a record even existed!

It will be pretty simple (and relatively inexpensive ) for someone else to challenge my record (assuming I am successful at breaking Stefan’s record, that is - which is far from a sure thing) because you can gear up a giraffe pretty easily.

Falling off and freemounting (especially when I’m tired) could really eat away at my speed… so I’ll have to try real hard not to fall off. Am I even allowed to fall off?

Thanks again, John!

Thanks JL! I sincerely appreciate your support and encouragement!

Andrew, Stefan’s web pages are where I got the idea of breaking the record. Stefan is quite the accomplished cyclist, but I wonder where he rode off to in recent years?
His 'raffe record is cool, and innovative. You’ve shown your capability on your 'raffe, and you can do it! Go for it!

Someone earlier asked about the Guinness guidelines, and they decide world records on a case-by-case basis. They use the applicable governing body’s recognition if there is any, so they don’t have to go through all the rigor-more-all of developing their own regulations. As John says, they don’t want to be in the business of regulating various sports.

On the wheel class issue, I think the geared wheels should be classified according to their theoretical size. If you had a 24" geared up 1.5 to an effective 36", you should be allowed to run in the 36" wheel class, along with direct drive cokers.

I say 4…
Unlimited/Geared
Coker
24"/150mm
Giraffe(Maybe this can be under the unlimited category)

It would be quite messy to have more categories where we’ll have guys setting hour records on 20",22",24"etc…

That four class division is also quite messy.

The more classes there are the more thinned out the attempts will be for each class. Limiting wheel sizes for individual speed records is not a good idea. For group races on a track (like we do at conventions) the wheel size restrictions make some sense because it would be really messy to have 8 people on Cokers trying to ride around a running track at full speed while trying to stay within their lane. It would be a mess and dangerous. For individual time trial events that is not an issue and I see no reason to have wheel size be a factor in dividing up any classes.

But that’s also why the IUF should regulate these record attempts so they can set sensible and consistent rules. Otherwise Guinness is going to be setting rules that might not make sense to unicycles.

Does anything, really, make sense to unicycles? I talk to mine all day long, and all it does is stare back with this vacant expression.

[Joe, i’m not picking on u!! :)]

i understand that argument in the ‘human powered vehicle’ classes where u get in/on, lie back and pedal like hell
i do think we need to factor in the additional level of difficulty that riding on one wheel introduces to this discussion
the geared up uni does allow for greater speed, but it is at a cost
the rider needs to be ‘more skillfull’ to maintain record speeds on such a machine as opposed to a ‘standard’ uni

your thoughts?

BTW, how do we get some kind of feedback from office bearers of the unicycling organisations on this issue?

Gearing a unicycle actually means the fittest person (eventually) will hold the record, as it is quite a different skill to riding a fixed axle unicycle. On a fixed wheel, it’s not necessarily who has the strongest legs/lungs that go the fastest, it’s the person who can peddle the fastest. Once we gear ourselves up, then it’s going to be much more fitness related because the person can match a gear to their technique and strengths.

I don’t have a problem with geared unicycles. I see a parallel with the bicycling community- no one remembers when derailleurs and gears were introduced, but they caused just as much debate in 2 wheeled circles when they first came out.

On the other hand, we are not bicycling and there is no need to go down that path. I too like the simplicity of a fixed axle unicycle. It’s one of the reasons I ride a unicycle as well as a bike- see my recent thread “why I prefer unicycle racing to bicycle racing” and you see my point.

My personal preference would be for a 2 class category- fixed and geared; regulated by the IUF. Guinness can use the geared category (or whichever is fastest) in it’s record database, because they are only interested in what is fastest/furthest/biggest/ etc etc. It is up the IUF to keep more detailed records with separate categories.

With regards to technology- people that go out to break records are usually a determined bunch- I don’t think cost comes into the equation too much. If you look at any record- people always upgrade their machines to the limits of what the rules and regulations allow. My Coker used in the 24hr record was far from a Std Coker- tubeless kit, SS spokes, carbon seat etc. If I thought I needed to drill holes in my rim and make a carbon frame to lighten it further I probably would have done so.

My $0.02

Ken

After all this discussion, how does one get the IUF into this debate?

I’d agree with that if geared unis become widely available. Fixed = a standard unicycle, ie. anything that’s a single wheel of any size that is one to one geared with a fixed wheel and unlimited = anything that has one wheel and is entirely propelled by human power.

Otherwise you end up with tons of different things and have to work on complicated categories and definitions.

Gild - the point about requiring more skill to ride a higher geared uni, is interesting, but in my experience, for just going forwards and turning a bit you can adapt to a different wheel size / crank size etc. pretty easily and I don’t see why gearing will be different. What makes unicycling fast difficult at the moment is spinning, I can’t believe that it’s more skillful to spin at half the speed. What’s interesting about geared unicycles isn’t extra skill, it’s the extra fitness required to spin at the same spinnyness, because you’ll be going faster.

Joe

I don’t know the source of that one. Where did you find that restriction? To my knowledge the IUF has no rules regarding giraffe racing.

If you’re going to place limitations on, you may as well include wheel size and crank arm length as well.

This most recent record was not set because the rider was “unfit.” It was set because he did it first! That’s what record setting is about. Part of his “first” included following the necessary requrements for Guinness to hopefully recognize it. Records are made to be broken. Presumably, the breaker of this record will be more “fit.”

Setting records is not about “access to technology.” Nobody had access to Unisk8r’s unicycle until he built it. Anyone else can build one too, if they really want. That is utterly irrelevant to setting a record. The record is about doing the longest distance in the time. That’s a world record.

For “absolute” world record attempts, no restrictions are needed. It is not about age, gearing, wheel size, experience, skill level, or anything else. It’s about how far did he get, on one wheel, in the time limit. The IUF refers to this as “unlimited.”

So far, nothing has come along to question the definition of an “unlimited” unicycle for racing. It is in the other areas that we may need to get more specific in our definitions.

I don’t have time to go into detail at the moment, but please remember this. The vast majority of IUF racing rules are designed for running races at unicycle conventions. At those conventions you have a group of 100+ riders standing around with 24" unicycles. Our rules are about how to race them. There is a little bit about setting records, but mostly as applies to our restricted form of racing. By current standards, what we might call a “racing unicycle,” even though it only has a 24" wheel. I hope to change this in future for racing of 700c wheels on tracks. Larger wheels are already raced off the track. We call this “unlimited” and it has no restrictions.

BTW, if you want to talk to the IUF, you could try sending emails to the people listed on the IUF web site. Asking questions into the thin air here only works if the right people are listening. I’ve been reading along, but I’m pretty busy with work and other stuff this week, so please be patient. I’ve got more to say, though possibly under one of the other threads.

Oh, and if I didn’t already mention it, congratulations on your hard work, attention to detail, and athletic achievement, even if Guinness doesn’t give you the time of day!

First of all: Congratulations Pete!!!

Regarding the “access to technology” argument:

If we were to decide that only people with access to equal technology were allowed to break records, the only category available would the the “shoeless running” record.

Right now, anyone with $1300 can buy a geared unicycle. For another $1000 you could certainly have it built into a bigger wheel (36"). In bicycle racing, $2300 hardly even gets you into the sport.

The furthest distance ridden in one hour on a unicycle should be just that. The furthest distance ridden in one hour on a unicycle. Until it gains a second wheel, there is no question that “Purple Phaze” is a unicycle.

If the record was “The furthest distance ridden in one hour on a non-geared, direct-drive 24” unicyle with 4" cranks" then that would be different.

As more people gain “access to technology” this record will be further challenged.

Re: New Hour Record

On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 01:28:03 -0600, “tomblackwood” wrote:

>I talk to mine all day
>long, and all it does is stare back with this vacant expression.

Must be hard to keep loving her. :slight_smile:

Klaas Bil - Newsgroup Addict

people who unicycle are shyly exhibitionistic - GILD

Re: New Hour Record

Hello @all
Sorry my bad english
I rode this record with a 26" Uni and 125mm (5") Cranks. You can’t compare
a record with 36" uni and a record with 26" Uni

Greetings from Switzerland

Stefan Gauler

More Informations about my old record:

(this site is in german)