Guys, I, too salute you for your excellent achievements. Very fine.
I must, however, differ in the view that the article was as good as some others I’ve seen.
In the first 7 paragraphs you’ve got 6 mentions of the word “clown” (or one of it’s other forms). All are protestations of what you are not. Anyone reading up to that point and not beyond would think that you have something to prove, rather than that you have just proved something.
Looking back to the Boston Globe article on Ben Plotkin-Swing and Joey Cohn there is only one mention of the word “clown” (one too many in my opinion) in a much longer piece.
My points being:
a) by bringing up the clown thing you put yourself on the defensive
b) you set yourself up in opposition to another category of unicyclist (clowns and other entertainers who use unicycles in their performances) which is not good for the activity of unicycling as a whole, i.e. in order to make yourself look good, you try to make other unicyclists look bad (perhaps not your intent, but what is an inevitable by-product)
c) you put the imagery of clowning back into the mind of the reader, which is clearly not your intention
Question: Do you really believe that there are no clowns out there who are physically fit enough to engage in MUni and perhaps even some who do in their spare time?
I’m sure that journalists more than likely bring the clown thing up themselves and force the issue. The proper response, in my opinion, is not to protest the comparision by rather to matter of factly state that clowns use unicycles for one purpose and we, the off-road, trials type, ride them for another different purpose and let the articles’ description of you and your achievements speak for themselves.
Anyway, sorry to beat this dead horse, but it keeps getting exhumed.
Once again, great riding guys.
Cheers,
Raphael Lasar
Matawan, NJ