problem with pedals

Hi!

I’m new to unicycling. I could ride short distances (25 ft) after spending a
couple of hours on a friend’s unicycle. So I ordered a Semcycle XL from Tom
Miller. I love my new uni, but there seems to be a problem with my pedals. It
appears that the “L” and “R” pedals are threaded so that they naturally tend to
unscrew, rather than tighten. More specifically, the threads on my R pedal are
of the “normal” (or right-handed) type, and the threads on the L pedal,
left-handed, which is opposite of what I would expect.

Am I totally missing something or is that the way they should be? I’m pretty
sure I matched the L and R pedals correctly and didn’t fit the saddle the
wrong way.

Thanks, Raman

Re: problem with pedals

>but there seems to be a problem with my pedals. It appears that the “L”
>and “R” pedals are threaded so that they naturally tend to unscrew, rather
>than tighten.

Maybe you are riding it backwards… Spin the seat around maybe?

RE: problem with pedals

The pedal marked “R” goes to your right foot. The pedal marked “L” goes to your
left foot.

-=+=- Phil Bartel -=+=-

COMPUTERVILLE Windows 95 & Internet Support

Voice (619) 477-4794 FAX (619) 477-4695 E-Mail felipe@computerville.com ICQ
#7327095 740 Tenth St., Imperial Beach, CA 91932-2216

>-----Original Message----- From: rvenkata@uiuc.edu [mailto:rvenkata@uiuc.edu]
>Sent: Friday, April 02, 1999 09:16 To: Felipe Subject: problem with pedals
>
>
>
>Received: from icicle.winternet.com [198.174.169.13] by mail.tnl-online.com
>with smtp id AJAPCDBF ; Fri, 2 Apr 1999 09:15:34 -0800 Received: (from
>server@localhost) by icicle.winternet.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA14487 for
>unicycling-outgoing; Fri, 2 Apr 1999 11:12:00 -0600 (CST)
>X-Authentication-Warning: icicle.winternet.com: server set sender to
>owner-unicycling using -f Received: (from adm@localhost) by
>icicle.winternet.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA14257 for <unicycling@winternet.com>;
>Fri, 2 Apr 1999
>11:11:04 -0600 (CST) Received: from clark.pathlink.com(165.113.238.170) by
>icicle.winternet.com via smap (V2.0) id xma014143; Fri, 2 Apr 99 11:10:30 -0600
> Received: (from news@localhost) by clark.pathlink.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) id
> IAA03454 for unicycling@winternet.com; Fri, 2 Apr 1999 08:53:41 -0800
> (PST) (envelope-from newsgate@newsguy.com) Received: from GATEWAY by
> enews with netnews for unicycling@winternet.com
> (unicycling@winternet.com) To: unicycling@winternet.com Date: Fri, 2 Apr
> 1999 10:53:35 -0600 From: Raman <rvenkata@uiuc.edu> Message-ID:
> <Pine.SOL.3.96.990402103812.526A-100000@ux11.cso.uiuc.edu> Organization:
> University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign X-Sender:
> newsgate@newsguy.com Subject: problem with pedals Sender:
> owner-unicycling@winternet.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: Raman
> <rvenkata@uiuc.edu>
>
>Hi!
>
>I’m new to unicycling. I could ride short distances (25 ft) after spending a
>couple of hours on a friend’s unicycle. So I ordered a Semcycle XL from Tom
>Miller. I love my new uni, but there seems to be a problem with my pedals. It
>appears that the “L” and “R” pedals are threaded so that they naturally tend to
>unscrew, rather than tighten. More specifically, the threads on my R pedal are
>of the “normal” (or right-handed) type, and the threads on the L pedal,
>left-handed, which is opposite of what I would expect.
>
>Am I totally missing something or is that the way they should be? I’m pretty
>sure I matched the L and R pedals correctly and didn’t fit the saddle the
>wrong way.
>
>Thanks, Raman
>
>
>

RE: problem with pedals

Thanks, I found the problem: I just hadn’t tightened the pedals enough.

I also found out that my “common sense” argument about the pedal threading was
wrong, and Sheldon Brown has a really clear explanation at:

http://www.sheldonbrown.com/gloss_p.html#pedal

Raman

> >pedals. It appears that the “L” and “R” pedals are threaded so that they
> >naturally tend to unscrew, rather than tighten. More specifically, the
> >threads on my R pedal are of the “normal” (or right-handed) type, and the
> >threads on the L pedal, left-handed, which is opposite of what I would
> >expect.