Hi,
Having a form of rolling trials as an event could be a really fun thing to consider- definately a fun thing to experiment with at a MUni weekend.
A lot of the ideas that are mentioned in this thread are very similar to the ideas that got tossed around when the original unitrials rules were being developed. The first events counted the number of falls, subsequent events adopted the biketrials format of counting dabs, and since then it’s evolved to it’s present format.
Personally I think that the best rules for an event are the simplest rules that require the least number of judgement calls and the least amount of training required for judges (because sometimes judges can be non-riders).
This is the beauty of the current unitrials format, which was inspired by bouldering competition rules and is increasingly being referred to as “freetrials” by the cycling community at large.
In the current rules, the approach is really simple. The organizers set out a collection of sections (obstacles), collectively referred to as the course. The rules are:
- you’re allowed unlimited attemps
- there’s no restriction on techniques
- you make it with no dabs and you get a point;
- if you don’t make it you don’t get a point.
- the person who rides the most sections (gets the most points) wins.
That’s it. All of these rules are objective, simple and easy to to enforce. I think that’s the key to success with rules.
The unitrials rules formerly included the requirment to assign point values to each section corresponding to their difficulty, with reference to the U-system for rating difficulty in trials. However, the problem with this is that it’s subjective, it adds a level of complexity, and it requires experience by the course setter to ensure it’s done well. Additionally, as long as everyone has plenty of time to attempt all sections, it doesn’t matter what the difficulty ratings were- the person who rides the most sections still wins! In other words, as long as there aren’t too many sections, difficulty ratings are completely irrelevant for ranking competitors.
Secondly, counting hops, or dabs, sounds simple until you actually try to do it in the chaos of a competition where you have 25 sections and there are people running all over the place and far too few judges. It can be done but it’s confusing and errors inevitably happen.
Regarding hopping in trials:
While much of trials requires hopping techniques, you can’t say that trials is dominantly any kind of technique. In fact, the sign of a well-designed trials course is that the course designer designs section requiring all types of techniques, including both rolling and hopping. If trials courses are dominated by hopping, it’s just because this type of section is a lot easier to make.
So in sum I think rolling trials could be a great idea but I think you could organize it with exactly the same rules as conventional unitrials, and just add the one technique restriction of no hopping allowed. In other words, hopping constitutes a dab. Since no dabs are allowed, you would just have to try again.
Kris