So i was round my nan and grandads and i had my bike there from my paper round and my brake cable had just snapped so my grandad started ranting about how i can’t ride it on the pavements without brakes for a joke i mentioned my unicycle (26" plus 20") didnt have breaks, the next thing,
“Oh they arent road legal they are for entertainment purposes only and should be kept in the circus”
Well, from a legal point of view, you cannot ride a bike on the path, regardless of the state of the brakes. This is regardless of age too, however, if you are younger than 16 then you won’t get issued a Fixed Penalty Notice.
A bike doesn’t legally need a brake even for road use, as long as it’s got a fixed hub. ie if you stop pedalling, the bike stops. You can see the similarity with a unicycle here!
A unicycle, however, is lucky and unlucky enough to be in a very grey area legally. It doesn’t fall in to the category of a carriage (bicycle, tricycle, velocipede or similar), so can legally be ridden on the path*, but, at the same time, it’s not prevented from riding on the road either.
STM
see my post regarding Fixed Penalty Notices a couple of months or so ago
I have a bicycle with a fixed hub. When you stop pedalling… you don’t stop pedalling. It won’t let you. Think “Human Catapult*”!
Apparently it can be done if you choose a low enough ratio, and you’re prepared to scrub the tyre. Otherwise, it’s like stopping a Coker when you’re riding it down the cresta run.
This is true: I was the British human catapult champion in (about) 1984.
I don’t think that’s true in this country - a fixed-wheel bike has to have a front brake to be road legal. I think possibly in the USA you’re allowed to ride brakeless if you’re mad enough.
Ah, yes, you’re right. Well, sort of; If a Penny Farthing isn’t a bike. If one wheel is directly driven off the cranks (ie no chain involved) then it doesn’t need need a brake. But if it’s chain driven then it does need a brake on the front wheel.