Dear Sir:
Please stop this annoying censorship and the associated notification!
It is only the softimage.com domain that is being censored to my
knowledge.
The notification with all headers is appended below. The e-mail message
that the notification complains about is appended after the notification.
I’m the owner of the unicycling (the sport of balancing on one wheel)
mailing list. We don’t like pornographic material on our mailing list
anymore than you like it on your mail servers or delivered to your
clients. However, what you are doing is slowly cutting yourself off
from the internet. I want nothing to do with your filter enforced
censorship and I’m sure most of the membership of our group agrees.
This time your filter didn’t like the word “hardcore”. The post in
question used it in the sense of being determined and dedicated to an
aspect of our sport, which has nothing to do with pornography.
This time I’m CC’ing this message to the unicycling mailing list (which
is bidirectionally connected to rec.sport.unicycling), so members of our
list can discuss what we should do about your filtering.
One idea is unsubscribing all your clients from our mailing list.
I’m sure we can think of more proactive ones as well.
opaugam, please let us (at least me) know what you think of all this?
Does anyone know what “Network Associates Webshield - e-mail Content
Alert” is?
Sincerely,
Ken Fuchs <kfuchs@winternet.com>
unicycling (rsu) mailing list owner & rec.sport.unicycling proponet
mailto:rsu-request@unicycling.org?subject=help
http://www.unicycling.org/mailman/listinfo/rsu/
news:rec.sport.unicycling
X-Coding-System: undecided-unix
Mail-from: From rsu-admin@unicycling.org Fri Jun 14 10:29:41 2002
Received: from unicycling.org (IDENT:root@unicycling.org [198.174.169.200])
by northpole.winternet.com (8.12.1/8.12.1/sci) with ESMTP id g5EFTegW004570
for <kfuchs@winternet.com>; Fri, 14 Jun 2002 10:29:40 -0500 (CDT)
SMTP “HELO” (ESMTP) greeting from unicycling.org
But really from :: IDENT:root@unicycling.org [198.174.169.200]
SMTP “MAIL From:” = rsu-admin@unicycling.org
SMTP “RCPT To:” = <kfuchs@winternet.com>
Received: from unicycling.org (IDENT:mailman@localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by unicycling.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA18912
for <kfuchs@winternet.com>; Fri, 14 Jun 2002 10:15:02 -0500
Received: from softgate1.Softimage.COM (SoftGate2.Softimage.COM [198.168.8.130] (may be forged))
by unicycling.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA18895
for <rsu-admin@unicycling.org>; Fri, 14 Jun 2002 10:14:09 -0500
From: postmaster@exchange.softimage.com
Received: from paperboy.CORP.Softimage.COM (paperboy.Softimage.COM [152.165.48.230])
by softgate1.Softimage.COM (8.12.2/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g5EFSkjs011423
for <rsu-admin@unicycling.org>; Fri, 14 Jun 2002 11:28:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from exterminator (exterminator.Softimage.COM [198.168.9.252]) by paperboy.CORP.Softimage.COM (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id LAA18621 for <rsu-admin@unicycling.org>; Fri, 14 Jun 2002 11:28:46 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <200206141528.LAA18621@paperboy.CORP.Softimage.COM>
X-Mailer: Network Associates, Inc. Webshield SMTP, Version 4.5 MR1a
Date: Fri Jun 14 11:29:17 2002
To: <rsu-admin@unicycling.org>
Subject: Network Associates Webshield - e-mail Content Alert
Sender: rsu-owner@unicycling.org
Errors-To: rsu-owner@unicycling.org
X-BeenThere: rsu@unicycling.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:rsu-request@unicycling.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:rsu@unicycling.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.unicycling.org/mailman/listinfo/rsu>,
<mailto:rsu-request@unicycling.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: rsu mailing list with rec.sport.unicycling gateway <rsu.unicycling.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.unicycling.org/mailman/listinfo/rsu>,
<mailto:rsu-request@unicycling.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.unicycling.org/pipermail/rsu/>
Network Associates WebShield SMTP V4.5 MR1a on exterminator intercepted a mail from
<rsu-admin@unicycling.org> which caused the Content Filter (Subject or Body contains
“hardcore”) to be triggered. If this is a legitimate communication, please reformulate
and resend your mail.
X-Coding-System: undecided-unix
Mail-from: From rsu-admin@unicycling.org Fri Jun 14 10:27:30 2002
Received: from unicycling.org (IDENT:root@unicycling.org [198.174.169.200])
by northpole.winternet.com (8.12.1/8.12.1/sci) with ESMTP id g5EFRTgW004408
for <kfuchs@mail.winternet.com>; Fri, 14 Jun 2002 10:27:29 -0500 (CDT)
SMTP “HELO” (ESMTP) greeting from unicycling.org
But really from :: IDENT:root@unicycling.org [198.174.169.200]
SMTP “MAIL From:” = rsu-admin@unicycling.org
SMTP “RCPT To:” = <kfuchs@mail.winternet.com>
Received: from unicycling.org (IDENT:mailman@localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by unicycling.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA18863;
Fri, 14 Jun 2002 10:11:36 -0500
Path: news.winternet.com!uunet!chi.uu.net!nyc.uu.net!ash.uu.net!plonk.apk.net!news.apk.net!news.uni-stuttgart.de!news.belwue.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.vmunix.org!newsfeed.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!news.brutele.be!nmaster.kpnqwest.ne
t!nnum.kpnqwest.net!EU.net!nreader2.kpnqwest.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
Reply-To: “Joe Marshall” <news@joemarshall.org.uk>
From: “Joe Marshall” <localhost@127.0.0.1>
Newsgroups: rec.sport.unicycling
References: <c28b5eea.0206140700.3ca3c961@posting.google.com>
Subject: Re: DM 28" unicycle
Lines: 27
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Organization: Ye 'Ol Disorganized NNTPCache groupie
Message-ID: <1024067570.735709@ananke.eclipse.net.uk>
Cache-Post-Path: ananke.eclipse.net.uk!unknown@212.104.149.18
X-Cache: nntpcache 2.4.0b5 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/)
NNTP-Posting-Host: 212.104.129.36
X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@kpnqwest.net
X-Trace: nreader2.kpnqwest.net 1024067685 212.104.129.36 (Fri, 14 Jun 2002 17:14:45 MET DST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 17:14:45 MET DST
Xref: news.winternet.com rec.sport.unicycling:34850
To: rsu@unicycling.org
Sender: rsu-admin@unicycling.org
Errors-To: rsu-admin@unicycling.org
X-BeenThere: rsu@unicycling.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:rsu-request@unicycling.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:rsu@unicycling.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.unicycling.org/mailman/listinfo/rsu>,
<mailto:rsu-request@unicycling.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: rsu mailing list with rec.sport.unicycling gateway <rsu.unicycling.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.unicycling.org/mailman/listinfo/rsu>,
<mailto:rsu-request@unicycling.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.unicycling.org/pipermail/rsu/>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 15:14:45 GMT
“Nic Price” <juggler_nic@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:c28b5eea.0206140700.3ca3c961@posting.google.com…
> I was just down at Juggleart in Melbourne tossing up whether to buy
> the 36" Coker or the 28" DM for commuting and general cruising around
> Canberra. I’m pretty much sold on getting the DM, but it has a crazy
> looking rim, that to my mind, looks quite weak - not at all what I’d
> expect from DM. It had a raised middle section where the spokes enter
> the spokeholes in the rim and then was somewhat V-shaped in
> cross-section. Is this standard on Dm 28" wheels and are the rims very
> strong or do people need to replace them? While I won’t be offroading
> or jumping it, I will want to be able to roll down small kerbs and hop
> up small kerbs (10cm max). Also, what is the maximum tyre size that
> people have found fits in the 28" frame?
Sounds like an aero type rim. I don’t think they’re generally any less
strong than box section rims although some people may disagree. If DM sells
it then it’s probably pretty hardcore.
I’d get a coker for commuting though, they’re much more fun and you can just
roll them up and down 10cm kerbs no problem. They’re easier to ride early in
the morning when you’re tired too, you have to do much less thinking about
where you’re pointing them.
Joe
rec.sport.unicycling mailing list - www.unicycling.org/mailman/listinfo/rsu