Why the reserection of old threads?

[Det-riot]

i kinda like it alot. its a neat glimps into the past of unicyclist.com.

i would like to who bumped these few threads made it up to the top of JC so i can thank them

[James_Potter]

truthfulblah just went back a zillion pages and started replying to a bunch of 'em…

[saskatchewanian]

And i thank him. those resurrected threads are still relevant and interesting to read

[Det-riot]

@saskatchewanian

And i thank him. those resurrected threads are still relevant and interesting to read

Agreed

[Hazmat]

Well that’s what i’m doing.

[dan_de_man]

yeah lets blame hazmat

[Hazmat]

@dan de man

yeah lets blame hazmat

.

[JJuggle]

@Det-riot

Why the reserection of old threads?

It’s Viagra for the thread.

[ntappin]

I like it when its relavent, I would much rather see an old thread brought back to life. It is always better to bring an old thread up than start a new one on the same topic, that way the search doesn’t get as clogged up.

[johnfoss]

@Det-riot

i would like to {know} who bumped these few threads made it up to the top of JC so i can thank them

That’s easy, look at the dates.

It is always better to bring an old thread up than start a new one on the same topic, that way the search doesn’t get as clogged up.

Not to mention the even more useful reason; saving us from writing the same stuff over and over, if the original writing is still relevant!