I was given a task the other day which included the following requirement:
“Content is categorized by the intersection of strategic priority and organizations and the pull through between organizations.”
I considered telling the woman who provided this instruction what she could pull but thought better of it.
All orginizations had better come together on a joint agreement on what’s best for the company’s future.
If this instruction was accompanied by a set of items to categorize I would say that the sentence means “throw these items into the trash bin.”
It doesn’t make a bit of sense. I would just ask the person assigning the task for clarification. There has got to be a simpler way of expressing what they want.
Oddly enough and in what one might call an extremely unlikely turn of events a PowerPoint file provided later did clarify the sentence.
Was she asking you to take the trash to the curb?
Don’t keep us in suspense. . .what does it mean?! 
im a freshman in highschool for crying out loud!!! how am i supposed to know??
The content has to be organized by priorities and organization. No wait. I give up. That sentence was nuts. I think I’m going to cry.
Content = content, a state of happiness or bliss
is categorized = is sorted out
by the intersection = next to the road junction
of strategic priority = with important military significance
and organizations = and organizations (How simple is that?)
and the pull = and the bedroom or bathroom lightswitch
through = are no longer in a romantic relationship
between organizations = between organisations.
So the sentence unpacks as:
<<A state of happiness or bliss is sorted out next to the road junction with important military significance, and organizations and the bedroom or bathroom lightswitch are no longer in a romantic relationship between organisations.>>
How simple is that?
PML
It’s nice to have you over on JC mikefule.
Cathy
In about 5 minutes I am meeting with the woman who wrote the original sentence. I’ll try that out on her.
Ah, she’s a no show. I was hoping to put a face to the inanity.
Very interesting.
This puts a perspective on matters well worth bearing in mind.
Edit: fight fire with fire
Sounds like the writer is practicing to be a politician.
The woman has a great future working as a consultant to help companies and departments develop mission statements.
Sounds like it came from Dilbert’s mission statement generator!
Let me do that for you:
“If your thoughts are rubbish merely
Don’t express yourself too clearly.”
“Content is categorized by [extra stuff that can be left out without altering the meaning] strategic priority and organizations and the pull through between organizations.”
I only got the part about intersection, I think that can be left out.
haha i cant stop laughing wen i read that, dont no y but i cant hmmmmmmmbut about the sentence um i think u make files of wut groups can do and put the the groups that can do it in the files but the above explanation looks preety good seriously, u coudlnt figger that out
It looks like a good candidate to go in my next english paper 
…except wait, that would be pledgarism! 