Private messages or posts? Just wonderin.
3,578 Posts and 2 PM’s. 
6,437 posts and 751 PMs
I have way more posts than PMs. I talk a lot but people don’t seem to like me, so I only have 247 PMs.
8446 posts and 790 PMs.
You beat me. 
Waaay more posts.
Poor Dave. I recommend that we inundate him with personal messages. Each one should contain the word awesome and at least one emoticon. Let’s show Dave in this way that we like him…we really like him. Then maybe he’ll pull over and let us get by him on the road.
I believe that it’s harper who’s known for pointing out how number doesn’t mean quality. Meaning, I posted a lot of stupid crap when I first signed up.
Hahaha I just sent him one with the word awesome in it. And I almost credited you with the word.
I like you (as a friend though). 
Done.
That would be mean…
Gah… emoticons… shudders
EDIT: I just sent him a PM with five sunglasses emoticon thingys in it.
I sit fire hot hot fire…3408 posts and a couple pms like 3 or 4.
I have 917 PMs. I should delete them but I’m lazy.
I also seem to have started 203 threads.
I feel like threadjacking because this seems to be the prefect thread for it.
Yeah, I know that’s FORTRAN. But if you want to be old school you would indent the statement properly and start on column 7. 
That statement is also redundant since FORTRAN already by default assumes that any variable I-N is an INTEGER. Maybe that’s why you find it sig worthy.
Now for a question. I’ve been wondering for a while if FORTRAN is what started the convention that variables named i, j, k and less commonly l, m, n are used as integer loop variables. Were variables i, j, k (or I, J, K) common convention for integer loop variables before FORTRAN?
291 pm’s and 280 posts
wayyyy more pms
Wow some peoploe seem to have a lot of PM’s… I have 794.
Edit: I don’t believe Obie… 
I only have 137.
Dosn’t Justin have something aroung 1,500 Pm’s??
1,598 pm’s, 2,427 posts. Actually a lot more pm’s than that, but many were deleted.