When this thing goes into production, I hope that
gear ratios other than 1.5:1 will be considered.
The problem with gear ratios that end in .0 or
…5 is that you will get two bald spots on your
tires, whereas other gear ratios will spread
the wear out over the entire tire.
When this thing goes into production, I hope that
gear ratios other than 1.5:1 will be considered.
The problem with gear ratios that end in .0 or
…5 is that you will get two bald spots on your
tires, whereas other gear ratios will spread
the wear out over the entire tire.
A good point. Ideally, with a gear ratio of n+0.5, an ambidextrous, or ambipedal rider would produce four bald spots on a tire. Frank Bonsch’s 1.57 hub would produce a uniform wear pattern on a tire.
>
> john_childs wrote:
> > *
> >
> > I think Klaas is commenting on the fact that uni.5 only toured the
> > U.S. so only U.S. unicycle nerds got to try it.
> >
> > I don’t think Klaas was trying to excluded himself from being
> > classified as a unicycle nerd. We know better.
> > *
>
> But it was the fact that he wrote “kilometers” rather than the correct*
> spelling of “kilometres” that John was noting.
>
> Phil, just me
>
> * you know it to be true…
Here is what is in my dictionary:
kil·o·me·ter n. Abbr. km A metric unit of length equal to 1,000 meters (0.62 mile).
>john_childs wrote:
>> I think Klaas is commenting on the fact that uni.5 only toured the
>> U.S. so only U.S. unicycle nerds got to try it.
>>
>> I don’t think Klaas was trying to excluded himself from being
>> classified as a unicycle nerd. We know better.
Hmm… as far as one can get to know someone through his posts only.
I’ve also got this feeling I know the regulars in here, though I’ve
only met one poster in person (Leo Vandewoestijne).
>
>But it was the fact that he wrote “kilometers” rather than the correct*
>spelling of “kilometres” that John was noting.
Oops, one instance of U.S. English (sic) spelling slipped through. Do
I have to apologise or apologize?
>
JF wrote:
>(Klaas wrote:)
>> Are you talking about 25 kilometers or 15 miles? The two do not
>> equate, as 15 mi is only 24.14 km.
>
>I rest my case.
This is not a nerdy difference. The discussion is about finesses such
as average speeds of 14.5 versus 15 MPH.