Since Christianity is now back on the front page of JC, I thought I’d create a new thread as a reaction to it rather than further pollute the UFC thread(s):
While I was cruising the net, when I bumped into this blog.
http://operationsuccess.blogspot.com/2007/01/spending-forever-in-prison.html
It’s basically a blogger who uses spending forever in prison as an analogy for going to hell. It implied that you should believe in the teaching of the bible because if you’re wrong you will go to hell. It reminded me of when I was younger, and I first began to stray from my religion (I was raised Christian).
I remember being dragged to a church rock concert event by a friend. I enjoyed the music, but then the singer started asking for new believers to come on stage, and spoke of how they were now saved. He said that before they were going to hell, and now that they were “saved” since they believed, they were going to heaven.
I still believed in god, however, I couldn’t wrap my mind around a religion that requires belief as a requirement to get into heaven. It seemed obvious to me that a person who tried to be a good person should get into heaven, regardless of whether or not they believed in god. I couldn’t conceive of a god to whom it mattered whether or not a person believed in him. Doesn’t seem arrogant that god would require worship and belief? Any god I could believe in would not be arrogant.
Furthermore, how good can a person truly be if the only reason they act in a moral fashion is the fear of hell. Isn’t a person who performs acts of charity and lives in a moral fashion without being motivated by the threat of hell truely a better person?
In that church, on that evening, I stopped being christian. I knew that if there was a god, these would never be his/her words.
In a recent youtube video featuring Richard Dawkins (Author of “The god delusion”), he is asked “What if you are wrong?”. From the christian perspective, the answer obviously would be that he would go to hell.
His answer is that the only reason (arguably) that a person follows the faith that they do is because of who their parents are and the place and time of his birth. He replies back to the person who asked the question with “What if YOU’RE wrong?” This seems true enough. If you’re born in the US, you’ve got a good chance of being christian. If you’re born in the middle-east, you’d likely be a muslim. If you’re born in south-east asia, you’d probably be buddhist. Since many religions require that you follow their beliefs to get into heaven, as a christian, you are running the risk of being wrong and ending up in some non-christian hell. Interesting isn’t it? You have the chance of going to so many different hells, but only one heaven.