On Fri, 30 Nov 2001 22:09:23 GMT, Christopher Grove
<c_r_grove@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I don’t think that that is a fair assessment at all. I think that > erosion or the creation of huge mud patches is exactly the reason for > the banning of bikes.
Every mud patch I come across on the trails I ride is a pock-marked mass
of hoof-prints, with (occasionally) the odd tyre-track towards the edge
(it’s more-or-less impossible to cycle or walk through the state horses
leave muddy ground). I’ve never understood why hoof-prints 8" deep don’t
count, but a shallow indentation that happens to be from a tyre is
suddenly environmentally damaging errosion.
On Fri, 30 Nov 2001 22:09:23 GMT, Christopher Grove
<c_r_grove@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I don’t think that that is a fair assessment at all. I think that > erosion or the creation of huge mud patches is exactly the reason for > the banning of bikes.
Every mud patch I come across on the trails I ride is a pock-marked mass
of hoof-prints, with (occasionally) the odd tyre-track towards the edge
(it’s more-or-less impossible to cycle or walk through the state horses
leave muddy ground). I’ve never understood why hoof-prints 8" deep don’t
count, but a shallow indentation that happens to be from a tyre is
suddenly environmentally damaging errosion.