Resurrection of the uni.5 29er

I had to take off work a little early today. I had a wheel to pick up, a unicycle to put back together, and a test ride to take. There is a description of the uni.5 SH 29er in this thread and a description of the first test ride in this thread in which the soft, 1018 steel axle twisted.
There is a photo gallery of the new unicycle here, where nothing has changed except the cranks and axle.

The new axle is machined from 17-4PH stainless steel recommended to me by Steve Howard, the artist who also designed and built the gorgeous frame. The alloy was easy to machine, left a nice finish, welded easily to the 1018 mild steel planet cage, and was a snap to harden by heating the welded assembly to 900F for an hour and allowing to air cool overnight. Amy Drummond, the ever persuasive master salesman at unicycle.com (and master mechanic and rider to boot, I might add … I have photos to prove it) convinced me to buy a pair of Dotek aluminum alloy cranks because they have VERY low “Q” and they are available in 140mm (5.5") length. I bought some steel Schwinn 140mm cranks also. She was right, the Doteks are perfect for the application and lower “Q” than the Schwinns.

I chose the 140mm cranks so that they would be smoother (shorter) to pedal and to start in the right range for mechanical advantage. In 43.5" mode the 140mm cranks provide substantially LESS mechanical advantage than the standard 150mm (6") cranks on a 36" wheel (Coker). The payoff is that the bigger wheel means more speed and the shorter cranks mean more stability at high cadence. In 29" mode, the 140mm cranks offer substantially MORE mechanical advantage than the stock Coker setup. So, with the movement of a single bolt and spacer (25 seconds on my workbench, 30 seconds in the field) I have either a respectable hill climber or a screaming roadster.

I put everything together and (being accustomed to geared uni’s) freemounted on the ninth try. Ha ha ha … I did it on the first try but it was tough. The light, aluminum 700c wheel and the relatively thin and lightweight Nanoraptor tire makes for much less rest angular momentum than a big, heavy, honkin’ Coker wheel and tire. When you put your foot down it goes and is already ahead of you. Starting was jerky to say the least. I rode about a mile and returned to my workbench to tighten the cranks and get a backpack full of tools and spares. Then I took off for a 5 mile ride before it got dark. The rolling mount on a geared unicycle began to come back.

There are a couple of VERY steep hills in my neighborhood, 15% grade or more, but very short. On the ride out I took these in 43.5" mode going up with some difficulty, mostly because of the unreal responsiveness of the wheel. Down the steep hills the unicycle practically launched me off of the saddle. On the flats it was frighteningly easy to get going faster than on a Coker and I was still finding the touchiness and sensitivity to be a little unnerving so I sat up straight and took it kind of slow, just under my runout speed supposedly. I was able to relax after about a mile and began to notice that riding this unicycle was much closer to riding a bicycle than any other one-wheeler I had been on. I was close to the ground and going REALLY fast without spinning my brains out and I was on a big wheel that gave me a smooth ride. The fat Nanoraptor at 65 psig had low rolling resistance and still soaked up the bumps.

After a couple of miles I got off, had a drink of water, checked the cranks, and shifted to 29" mode. In less than a minute I was back on a normal unicycle again. It was easy, although now strange, to mount. I could idle the 29er and ride it backwards easily. I rode it for about a half mile, the 29er supposedly being a respectable commuter in its own right, and it actually got boring; I was used to the high Mach numbers now. So I switched back to 43.5" mode in about 30 seconds and decided to save the 29" action for the hills on the way back in. The feel for the geared uni began to return more and more and the backlash, less noticeable than on the original 24" after its tour, began to fade away into the background. The inertia of the Coker that has to be overcome in turns was not there at all.

When I got to the hills I shifted back to 29" mode. I mounted going uphill with no problem and grabbed the SH, or Kinport, handle on the seat to start cranking up the hill. And then I thought, hey, why am I doing this? I let go of the handle and cruised up the hill like it wasn’t even there. Then I rode down the other side easily and fully under control. This is really transportation. It’s fast where it’s flat and can be shifted for long climbs or descents. It weighs nothing, the frame is something like 850 grams and the total is 15 pounds, about half a Coker.

I remember getting my Coker. It was so weird and such a gas to ride. Suddenly I could ride a unicycle faster than I could probably run. It was also fun to design and build this hub and put it on a 24" wheel so it could be compared to the 36" wheel on the Coker. But I really wanted to build a unicycle with a bigger effective wheel than the Coker or there was no point. Making it shiftable was just a bonus. Without any exaggeration, this is the most incredible unicycle I have ever ridden.

Re: Resurrection of the uni.5 29er

Beautifully Written. Excellent Work. Awesome Comeback for the uni.5 29er.

Dylan

I think Tammy wants a story on the uni.5 29er for On One Wheel. :wink:

That looks really cool, thanks for the write-up
So when does it come to a neighborhood near me?:wink:

Re: Resurrection of the uni.5 29er

I had to read this 4 times before relising that it did not say ‘tools and spears’. I was a little deflated, to say the least, when I descovered you did not intend to announce the outcome of an afternoon of urban hunting. “Ey, matey, THAR SHE BLOWS: Late model Cadillac! Put yer arm into it, and send one into the trunk! Now we’re get’n some wheres!”

-Christopher

the description and the machine both sound lovely

if i may, i’d like to ask the question that must be getting close to ‘where’s your other wheel’ in irritation factor for mr harper

what is required to make this gearing-system shiftable without dismounting?
is that in development?
or does it still need to be conceptualised?

Harper,

You must realize how bitter this makes me feel, since I almost had a chance to ride the softer version in New Orleans. :slight_smile: Then again, I’m probably too scared to ride it flat out.

I just wanted to agree that your write-up was well done, and of course the craft behind your project is also very cool.

I love that color frame btw. Very nice looking cycle.

Lewis

Re: Resurrection of the uni.5 29er

GILD wrote:
> what is required to make this gearing-system shiftable without
> dismounting?

  1. Excellent balance.
  2. A long spanner.

:slight_smile:

Regards,
Mark.

Wow!

Nice looking frame, useful sounding gears, fun performance. Excellent stuff. When will it be coming to Carlton?

Oh…:frowning:

:wink:

Yes, I have been asked this many times.
The requirements are one: a sincere death wish.

The tolerances for an epicyclic unicycle hub are kept quite tight in order to minimize the backlash of the gear system. Shifting gears without increasing the backlash is of course impossible because some slop must be introduced to allow the parts to move. To make a shifting system that is tool-free is already a difficult proposition. To make one that is tool-free with extremely tight tolerances that will not bind when being shifted at high speeds is near impossible. To operate a system like this at high speeds and expect to be able to react to the change in pedalling cadence instantly would be suicidal.

Epicyclic hubs for bicycles literally have infinite backlash. Nobody cares about this and why should they? It does make shifting gears very easy.

Agreed, that changing gears in motion is a bad idea. But what about refining the mechanism so that tools aren’t required? It’d be tre cool to be able to hop off, reach down and toggle a quick release (or something like that), and enter hill-climbing mode…

-Jon

Yes. That would be tres cool. How do you do it? Now, how do you do it to handle the required torque in operation? Now, how do you do it to additionally add no backlash? Now, how do you fit the zero-backlash, tool-free, high-torque shifting device in the space available?

Greg, you must be totaly dissapointed by the shifting procedure; the cycle is vertualy worthless without shift-on-demand. Seeing how we’re friends and all, I’d like to see you recoup some of your loss, and am prepared to pen you a check for Nine Dollars. Just send the cycle the way you do laundry- I’ll be looking for the purple light from the sky. It’s gona make a swell end table.

-Christopher

OK, I’m set for narrow-range beam. I can trust you on that check for nine dollars, can’t I? Please write it out in binary. I’ll explain to the teller before I cash it.

Re: Resurrection of the uni.5 29er

Sounds fantastic. Why don’t you bring it to the next convention and beat all
the Coker guys in the 10k marathon? That would serve them (us) right!

—Nathan

Re: Resurrection of the uni.5 29er

May I join the choir of praise and voice my admiration for this
project. It sounds like nothing short of a Super Clean Dream Machine.

On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 12:09:41 -0600, harper
<harper.e68zm@timelimit.unicyclist.com> wrote:

>The tolerances for an epicyclic unicycle hub are kept quite tight in
>order to minimize the backlash of the gear system. Shifting gears
>without increasing the backlash is of course impossible because some
>slop must be introduced to allow the parts to move. To make a shifting
>system that is tool-free is already a difficult proposition. To make one
>that is tool-free with extremely tight tolerances that will not bind
>when being shifted at high speeds is near impossible. To operate a
>system like this at high speeds and expect to be able to react to the
>change in pedalling cadence instantly would be suicidal.

Just a layman’s suggestion. Would it be possible to round the ends of
the teeth on the gears, so as to yield “zero” backlash when the gears
are in their usual engaged position, but yet sufficient backlash to
allow on the fly shifting when the gears are about to shift from one
position to another?

Klaas Bil

A person weighs less at high tide.

?

Really? How? Please explain…

Re: Resurrection of the uni.5 29er

onlyonewheel wrote:
>> A person weighs less at high tide.
>
>
> Really? How? Please explain…

And at neap tide, too.

At high tide the moon pulls on the person harder than on the Earth, pulling
the person away from the Earth - just like the waves. Keep in mind the
center of gravity of the Earth is about 4K miles from someone standing on
the surface.

At neap (lowest) tide the moon pulls on the Earth harder than on the person,
pulling the Earth away from the person.

I think you’ll find it’s only ever second high tide that makes you lighter…

One high tide is caused by a bulge of water pulled around the Earth’s surface by the moon. The other high tide is a bulge on the opposite side of the Earth. This one’s harder to explain but think of the bulge of water whizzing round the Earth and causing a sort of centrifulgal force which throws a bulge of water upwards. (Yes… I know there’s no such thing as centrifugal force, but it’s a useful intuitive concept when describing the combined effect of several forces).

So, one high tide has the moon more or less over your head, pulling the water away from the Earth, and pulling you upwards too. The other high tide has the moon more or less on the opposite side of the Earth so you are pulled down that little bit harder.

And I’m not entirely persuaded by your argument on neap tides. Convince me.:wink:

Re: Resurrection of the uni.5 29er

Scott Kurland explained the obvious:[color=darkred]
> >> A person weighs less at high tide.
>
> At high tide the moon pulls on the person harder than on the Earth,[/color]
pulling
> the person away from the Earth - just like the waves.

Except that it doesn’t necessarily hold true. It only takes a small meal at
high tide, or a small poo at low tide, and people can weigh less at low tide
than at high :stuck_out_tongue:


Danny Colyer (remove safety to reply) ( http://www.juggler.net/danny )
Recumbent cycle page: http://www.speedy5.freeserve.co.uk/recumbents/
“He who dares not offend cannot be honest.” - Thomas Paine