Re: Thank you!

On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 04:03:58 GMT, “Fritz Lott”
<fritz.lott@mindspring.com> wrote:

>
>Thank you for your comments! Inspirational!
>–
>Fritz Lott
>220 Sunnyridge Lane
>Golden Valley, MN 55422-5300

This post ended up wrongly in the spam bin. But it isn’t spam. For the
benefit of those who responded to the original question by Fritz, I’ll
reply to this Thank you! post which should put it back on the forum.

Klaas Bil - Newsgroup Addict

I have a feeling you might need two points of contact with the ground for such a thing to work? Or at least training wheels on the front and rear. - John Foss commenting on a picture of a one-wheeled vehicle he saw on RSU.

My apologies. I sent it to spam because it was unlinked to any other thread and, as such, had no real content. I will not trash this thread although, as it is not linked to any other, also has no real content.

Re: Thank you!

On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 16:29:08 -0600, harper
<harper@NoEmail.Message.Poster.at.Unicyclist.com> wrote:

>My apologies. I sent it to spam because it was unlinked to any other
>thread and, as such, had no real content. I will not trash this thread
>although, as it is not linked to any other, also has no real content.

I reply risking to post ‘no content’. I (for one) accept the apology,
but I disagree with Ol’ Harper about the ‘no content’. The original
posted asked a valid question, got a lot of useful response and then
posted to espress his gratitude. That’s real content to me. And not
linking to any other thread is not indicative of lack of content
either, most threads start unlinked to any other.

If you want to spamdump all the posts with /really/ no content you
would have a day’s job.

Klaas Bil - Newsgroup Addict

I have a feeling you might need two points of contact with the ground for such a thing to work? Or at least training wheels on the front and rear. - John Foss commenting on a picture of a one-wheeled vehicle he saw on RSU.

Re: Re: Thank you!

Touche’