Re[2]: crank length

Text item:

>What does a rider give up in going with a shorter crank arm? Stability?
>Anything? I’m interested in going a little faster on my 24", but not at the
>expense of control… Thoughts?

You give up leverage. You can’t stop as fast, accelerate as fast, or ride stuff
as steep or bumpy as you could with longer cranks. But unless you’re riding off
road (a lot), You should find the 5" much more efficient on a 24" wheel than 6".

John Foss

Text item: External Message Header

The following mail header is for administrative use and may be ignored unless
there are problems.


Reply-To: (Hugh Allison) Precedence: bulk Sender: Subject: Re: crank length From: (Hugh Allison) To: JohnX Foss
<>, Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998
10:43:39 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=“us-ascii” Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <v01540b01b132ea91714e@[]> Received: from
unknown( by via smap (V1.3) id sma000687; Mon Mar 16
10:43:12 1998 X-Authentication-Warning: smap set sender to
<allison@cwholesale .com> using -f Received: (from smap@localhost) by (8.7.5/8.7.3) id KAA00689; Mon , 16 Mar 1998 10:43:29 -0500
Received: from by via sma
p (V2.) id xma011547; Mon, 16 Mar 98 09:45:24 -0600 Received: (from
adm@localhost) by (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA11697 for
<>; Mon, 16 Mar 1998 09:45:50 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from server@localhost) by (8.8.8/8.8.8) id
JAA11839 for unicycling-outgoing; Mon, 16 Mar 1998 09:46:26 -0600 (CST)
Received: from (
[]) by (8.8.6/8.8.5) with ESMTP id
IAA21644 for <>; Mon, 16 Mar 1998 08:13:32
-0800 (PST) Received: from (
[]) by fmm (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id
IAA14219 for <>; Mon, 16 Mar 1998 08:09:12
-0800 (PST) Return-Path: