I will start my new thread like so:
NEW THREAD!!!
this thread concerns all you alternative thinkers out there…
I will ask a question and you shall answer it…
starting with:
What is the cheese grater effect?
and a bonus question:
how does one become a bonafied, certified superior being?
Answer to bonus question: join The Owen’s skool of altered thinking…
The cheese grater effect is when you try a unispin or a suicide mount without shin guards, and the pedal cheese grates your skin.
BONUS QUESTION
You cannot become one. There is only one. He is sitting in my chair.
you’re very close Potter…
and for your question…The answer WOULD be god…but not for the reasons you might think…he’s omnipresent so techniquelly (mind the spelling) he’s sitting in your chair…
you are also sitting in your chair, but I strongly doubt your holiness…
if no one else is gonna answer these questions then I’ll ask my own…
if we all were bananas would that make the government a bunch of chimpanzees?
A) He is sitting in my chair
B) I am sitting in my chair
Therefore
C) I am him.
wrong, therefore you are a cat.
for all cats are mortal, you are mortal
therefore you are a cat
No no no, this is exactly what Socrates proved wrong hundreds of years ago!!!
Here’s an example:
If it’s raining, is the sidewalk wet?
YES
If the sidewalk is wet, is it raining?
NOT NECESSARILY.
If I’m a cat, am I mortal?
YES
If I’m mortal, am I a cat?
NOT NECESSARILY.
See, I quoted from Socrates’ works, I’m clever.
Socrates is also a cat
he just said that to hide it…
Ah, but the real question is,
was Socrates immortal???
Also, do you pronounce Socrates as Sock-rayts or Sock-ruh-tees? I think it’s the second one.
It has to be Sock-ruh-tees to work in Monty Python’s Philospher’s Song:
Immanuel Kant was a real pissant
Who was very rarely stable
Heidegger, Heidegger was a boozy beggar
Who could think you under the table
David Hume could out consume
Schopenhauer and Hegel
And Wittgenstein was a beery swine
Who was just as schloshed as Schlegel
There’s nothing Nietzsche couldn’t teach ya
'Bout the raising of the wrist
Socrates, himself, was permanently pissed
John Stuart Mill, of his own free will
On half a pint of shandy was particularly ill
Plato they say, could stick it away
Half a crate of whiskey every day
Aristotle, Aristotle was a bugger for the bottle
Hobbes was fond of his dram
And René Descartes was a drunken fart
“I drink, therefore I am”
Yes, Socrates, himself, is particularly missed
A lovely little thinker
But a bugger when he’s pissed.
Let’s not forget that Socrates drank himself to death…
Oh, yeah! this seemingly pointless thread is kicking off!..see how subtle I am?..
And whoever quotes Monty Python has my respect…
monty python rules all!!!
NU!
No no, it’s NI.
Nu, nu!
No, not NU, NI!
NI?
Yes, that’s good. NI, NI!
Oh, what sad times are these when passing ruffians can say ‘NI’ at will to old ladies. There is a pestilence upon this land. Nothing is sacred. Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
So how many caught the joke? Pretty clever, if you ask me.
Death by Cheese Grater would be the WORST way to go.
or death by sand paper…
OUCH!..
Ok, back to the questions: what’s the difference between a cat and a clause?
it’s a good one…
I saw that and thought Monty Python logic. How to tell if a woman is a witch.
there’s always this:
well yeah but we all knew that. That just is more substanchual proof. (im a bad speller)
wow…that’s good!..
Nobody has a answer to my question?
Substantial.
Another point for me, wheee.
the answer is: A cat has claws at the end of his paws while a there’s a pause at the end of the clause…
NEW QUESTION!!!
where the hell is a pushmepullyou’s buisness end!?