I own pairs of 114, 127, 138, 150 and 165 ISIS cranks. The three unicycles I ride (trials/street, mUni, road) are all ISIS compatible. Changing crank length has helped me progress in my riding. My most recent experiments with crank length are on my 29" road unicycle. I’ve ridden it with 150, 138 and 125 cranks. As it was previously mentioned, I could speed up hills better on the shorter cranks, and the feeling of spinning the pedals, rather than pushing them down, was definitely better with the shorter cranks. However, I felt my legs were burning more after climbing a hill with the shorter cranks. There are some pretty steep hills in my neighborhood, and, using shorter cranks, I either keep momentum, or get off and walk. Another scary thing: If I’m using short cranks and feeling weak, I may lack the strength to pedal faster and thus avoid a UPD. Riding in traffic is fairly new to me. I would rather, for the time being, ride more slowly but with more control.
After riding a few times with shorter cranks, then returning to the 150s, I felt more comfortable mounting, idling, riding backwards, stand-stills and general goofing-off…on the 29". Conversely, using shorter cranks felt better while riding forward, but was scarier and inhibited me from wanting to try other techniques on the 29".
Relative beginners have to be careful, I think, about emulating the setup of more experienced riders whom are more efficient, more experienced, and whom can handle shorter cranks. There is a natural progression toward shortening cranks, but I don’t think it should be forced. A lot of the conversation about shorter cranks involves riding greater distances and riding faster. There is more to learning unicycling than distance and speed, and for all the other stuff, longer cranks have been, in my experience, a better learning tool.