More on skill levels (fwd)

Forwarded message:
> From: Unicycle@aol.com Date: Tue, 20 Jun 1995 23:23:10 -0400 Message-Id:
> <950620232308_99054957@aol.com> To: unicycling Subject: More on skill levels
>
>
> John Foss wrote: Aside from the recordkeeping problem, the main disadvantage
> of this otherwise good idea is that it changes the meaning of the levels. To
> say you are level 5, using the above system, another rider would then have
> to ask you what skills you can and what skills you cannot do. Riders from
> widely different geographic areas would not have an easy way to compare
> their skill levels.
>
> That is why I didn’t push this idea any farther with the committee.

I understand your point, but I will mention that the skill level only indicates
a minimum competency, not the actual set of skills that I rider has. I’m a level
3 rider, but I can idle both sides with one foot or two, ride backwards, ride
one footed, and ride with the seat out front. I could probably ride backwards in
a circle without much trouble, but I haven’t bothered to do so because it is a
level 5 skill, and I figured I’ll worry about it later after wheel walking.

Beirne


Beirne Konarski | Subscribe to the Unicycling Mailing List bkonarsk@mcs.kent.edu
| Send requests to unicycling-request@mcs.kent.edu Kent State University |
Unicycling Web Page: “Untouched by Scandal” |
http://nimitz.mcs.kent.edu/~bkonarsk/