Least Replies

Off-topic
21

this post counts for -350 posts on account of it’s pointlessness.

SHEEP. BAAAABBAAAA! CATTLE PROD. BAZZAAAP! SHEEP. SIZZLE

smash,dead. shock, Alive.

So as you can see, he has succeeded in getting the least replies.

Thank me later, Owen.

22

I posted a “please wil people not even look at this thread” thread once… it was brilliant… no one even saw it. (hardley)

23

No post mentioning Cattle Prods could ever be described as pointless.

Phil

24

you’re right. So, to make up for it I will make this pointless post which will count for -1000 posts.

how much **** could a ****chuck chuck if a ****chuck could chuck ****?

25

i bet this will turn into the next most replies thread

26

your all quite annoying arent you

27

You’re all quite annoying, aren’t you?

28

my head is at just the right angle for me not to move to look at the screen yet i could still fall asleep

29

you said what i said but with some snazztastic punctuation

30

you said what I said but with some snazztastic punctuation

31

why did you miss out the word “wood?” ??? :thinking:

32

no one beats me!
(a lot of people can back me up on that! :stuck_out_tongue: )

p.s sorry for replying! :roll_eyes:

33

well Laura, why wouldn’t I miss out the word ****?

34

hmmmm… i dont really know??? :frowning:

your confussin me :thinking: moans :frowning:

laura x :sunglasses:

35

Sensing that this thread is grinding to a halt i feel the need to interveine…I post rarely on these forums due to my strict rule about only contributing when i sense the post could be 100% useful in furthering the cause of unicycling, as this thread clearly does.

RE: woodchucking…is there any such thing as a finger twister where you have to type somehting awkwards as fast as possible?

the possibilities are seemingly endless for the finger / keyboard twister.
(aprox.16 seconds, minus points for the lack of capitalistation)

Tim

36

all i can say is…ehh?

i didnt understand a word of that?!!?!!?!! lol

isnt an argument about the word wood being missed good enough :frowning: ?

oh well…!!! :stuck_out_tongue:

37

least replies?

try talking about yourself then that will make everyone avoid your post

38

least replies

This will never work.
I have made posts before where i wanted replies and got none. there are heaps of posts with no replies - so you cant really make a no replies thread - unless you never start it - which is impossible.

39

Re: least replies

Oh it’s definitely possible to not start a new thread. I did it just a minute ago. I’ll do it again in the morning.

40

Re: least replies

It could work. Not from a regular poster, but if a moderator or Gilby made one, it would be easy. It could only ever equal the multitudes of one-post threads, but it could work. Gilby could make a secret thread that people can’t view, and it would be least views and least replies. Or he could make a thread called least replies and lock it - preventing anyone from spoiling his little game. The least replied thread would soon fall down the list like all other unpopular threads, and would most likely be forgotten. Pete, did you visit New Plymouth and steal my unicycle last weekend? I’m not accusing you, just checking, gotta investigate all possibilities.