If it makes you feel better - A 3 wheeled bike!

Found this one today on craigslist. Got a kick out of it and thought others might too. :smiley:

I can’t wait for him to list a ‘tricycle with one wheel’.

Ah ha! That’s where my other wheel went to. :slight_smile: :roll_eyes: :stuck_out_tongue:

No, my tummy is still a little sore from that spicy, spicy taco I had for lunch. Hopefully this ginger ale will do the trick…

He could transform it into this but with an extra wheel. :smiley:

How’d that ginger ale work out Maestro? Maybe a review is in order…

It wasn’t a magic bullet, but it helped a bit. Shall I post a pic of what came out in the toilet?

Definitely. Maybe not here though, perhaps on facebook…

Probably going to run my own ginger ale test one day soon.

I wasn’t feeling bad, so I can’t say that this made me feel better. Thanks for the thought, though.

Is it just me or did we just get a little sidetracked here??? :stuck_out_tongue:

This thread got me wondering: We have 3-wheeled unicycles (as above), why don’t we have 6-wheeled bicycles?

You mean like this???

Nice!

I think Billy’s idea is good too. I see more tall bikes around these days, would be cool if someone made one with stacked wheels.

…Was talking with my brother yesterday, he has one of these 3 wheeled units and he tells me that they are sold as 3 wheeled bicycles. An adult tricycle is like a large ‘big-wheel’ pedaled directly from the front wheel, he added.

The deciding factor may be whether it is chain driven rather than how many wheels it has. California law reflects this too…

Did a little google search…3 wheeled bicycle it is :frowning:

1) I thought so too.
2) I was trying to find something like Billys but couldn’t. Here in Australia, we only get the 2 wheeled version of it. :frowning:

What does the Californian law state when it comes to unicycles???

To be more clear the (CA) law defines a bicycle as a self propelled vehicle that is chain or belt driven. This excludes most unicycles but includes giraffes of course. Non-belt driven cycles are presumed to be toys is the reasoning I believe.