Weeell… The product I currently use for organizing my photos, iView MediaPro, was bought by Microsoft a few years ago and “absorbed into the behemoth.” They eventually came out with a product called Microsoft Expression Media, which appeared to be essentially the same thing as the last version of MediaPro (which was a good thing). But I couldn’t see going forward using a “professional digital asset management” product from Microsoft, so I haven’t switched or upgraded yet.
There’s a new version (2.0) of Microsoft Expression Media. I went to click on the What’s New in Version 2? link on the web site and I got a pop-up asking to install Microsoft Silverlight but not telling me what it is. For this and similar Microsoft-related reasons, I don’t need to learn more about Expression Media. I feel bad for the folks at the old iView, many of whom left the company after the Microsoft purchase, while others moved to the US to be part of the new team.
I expect to eventually switch to Adobe Lightroom. It gets good reviews, goes well with the other Adobe suite products, and is covered with lots of articles in my NAPP magazine so it seems like the logical choice for me. However there are some things iView/Expression can do that Lightroom can’t, and the author of The DAM Book, Peter Krough, says there are some compelling reasons why he sticks with Expression Media. I got to speak with him directly when I went to Photoshop World last year.
Software aside, here are a few things I do that you can do anyway:
My photos are organized by date. Top-level folders are the year, and groups of images (like events) are in subfolders by date. For example, a folder called “20080330 Moab Muni Fest” for this year’s Moab pictures. This keeps the folders in date order, even if they’re outside their year folder.
The individual images are also organized by date. The important part of doing this is to keep your camera(s) clock(s) up to date. Especially when you fly to different timezones! I often forget. If you only have one camera it’s not a big deal, but if you have multiple ones it’s good to synchronize them from time to time. That way if you’re using both together, all your shots can be in order.
After downloading (and backing up) images from the camera card, I do a batch rename using the date. This is done within MediaPro, but can probably be done with Lightroom, Aperture or other programs. Or with cheap or free utilities like ExifRenamer, a little utility for the Mac. I use ExifRenamer if I forgot to reset my camera when traveling to a different timezone as well.
So with a simple keyboard command I can apply a preset renaming scheme to any group of pictures. In my case, I do the date so it will come out in numerical order. My photo filenames look like this:
2008-03-28_13-17-29_foss.dng
Year, month, day, hour, minute, and something to identify it with the shooter, though that data is inside each image file as well, if I’ve done my homework.
Not really, because I never used it before using MediaPro. I’ve managed to hold onto all those databases over the years by being a decent backer-upper. Also, you can write most of your metadata to the files themselves. After adding this important step to my process, I’ve found that photos I upload to Smugmug will have their keywords and captions already there if I’ve used those fields.
Generally I assume it’s me that’s confused. Not sure what you mean. It’s taken me a while to develop my workflow with MediaPro, and it’s still far from perfect. It takes me too long to get my photos up for everyone to see! I can’t help tweaking them first…
I can move the files all I want, especially if I do it from within the software. As for migrating the data to Lightroom, That’s something I’ll have to look into. But again, most of the metadata can be saved to the image files so that’s not such a huge problem. It becomes a problem with the “special queries” I’ve created, such as only pictures of a certain person (when that person isn’t keyworded), collections I put together for photo books, etc.
I used to use ThumbsPlus when I was on Windows, but at the time I was only interested in the viewer capabilities of the program and didn’t delve much into the other areas it had. It was great for viewing nearly every kind of image file. Not sure where it is these days.