I was thinking–not too hard, mind you, but I noticed that many anti religous figures and such have large beer bellies.
Furthermore, we have the anarchist. Some anarchists go for speed and power, but the majority just go for momentum.
And, anyway, if you exercise a ton, aren’t you just replacing one kind of obesity with another? Homer Simpson eats just as much as Michael Phelps.
As you can see, we never truly escape the concept of Sports–err, I mean…
esh ah pahrodah ahf ah pahrodah
yay i made a thread that was doomed to die.
No good christians?
You got me; I am an atheist, and I am very obese.
See JJuggle’s comments on the NYC laws against restaurants serving transfats: He thinks obesity is bad, and the government is right to stop this bad behavior:
If someone commits it as an act, we take steps to prevent them from doing it again and punish them for having done it. If someone is inclined to do it but hasn’t we take reasonable steps to prevent them from doing it. What difference does it make that you assign the label “bad” to it?
Reasonable people disagree as to whether it is “good” or “bad” for the state to put certain criminals to death. Reasonable people do not disagree that it is harmful to the convicted criminal. What logic is there to an external source of so-called morality when the same act can be both “good” and “evil” depending which group of people you talk to all of whom believe in the same God?
