28 inch cruising

My coker wheel seems to be permanently wobbly :frowning:

Rather than buy another Coker wheel for my road riding, I’m thinking of getting
a 28 inch wheel with short cranks. I know that this used to be the standard
road-riding setup. What length cranks do people prefer–is 125 too short? How
much of a come-down will this setup be–after being used to a Coker?

Any update on the Super Coker? Will there be prototypes by the end of the year?
How are you making the rim?

Thanks,

David Maxfield Bainbridge Island, WA

Re: 28 inch cruising

>Rather than buy another Coker wheel for my road riding, I’m thinking of
getting
>a 28 inch wheel with short cranks. I know that this used to be the standard
>road-riding setup. What length cranks do people prefer–is 125 too short?
How
>much of a come-down will this setup be–after being used to a Coker?

On UAM most of the people riding 28" unis had between 114 and 102mm cranks. I
rode on 114 and would of rather had shorter cranks. I’d say find a good
wheelbuilder and stick with your coker. It’s faster and smother and easer on
the rider.

Peter

Re: 28 inch cruising

110 cranks on a coker are great :slight_smile: This is what I used and love them, they make
the Coker even smoother than normal.

Roger

The UK's Unicycle Source <a href="http://www.unicycle.uk.com/">http://www.unicycle.uk.com/</a>

----- Original Message ----- From: “Peter Nyflot” <peter-nyflot@bethel.edu> To:
“Unicycle Mailing List” <unicycling@winternet.com> Sent: Monday, October 23,
2000 8:50 PM Subject: Re: 28 inch cruising

>
> >Rather than buy another Coker wheel for my road riding, I’m thinking of
> getting
> >a 28 inch wheel with short cranks. I know that this used to be the
standard
> >road-riding setup. What length cranks do people prefer–is 125 too short?
> How
> >much of a come-down will this setup be–after being used to a Coker?
>
>
> On UAM most of the people riding 28" unis had between 114 and 102mm
cranks.
> I rode on 114 and would of rather had shorter cranks. I’d say find a good
> wheelbuilder and stick with your coker. It’s faster and smother and easer on
> the rider.
>
> Peter

Re: 28 inch cruising

Maxfield D <maxfieldd@aol.com> wrote:
> My coker wheel seems to be permanently wobbly

> Rather than buy another Coker wheel for my road riding, I’m thinking of
> getting a 28 inch wheel with short cranks. I know that this used to be the
> standard road-riding setup. What length cranks do people prefer–is 125
> too short? How much of a come-down will this setup be–after being used to
> a Coker?

I’ve just fitted 127mm cranks on my Coker - it is smooooth! In fact, if you
are after the cruising with a 28" wheel, I’d be tempted to get 110mm cranks.
Roger Davies rides with 110mm on his Coker, but he is superhuman and still
managed to mangle his wrist. A 28" would be much more controlable than a Coker
with 110s though.

I think that whatever you do with a 28" there will be some comedown after a
Coker. The weight of the wheel gives a Coker so much rolling momentum and this,
coupled with the huge tyre, is largely responsible for the smoothness of the
ride. I got to ride a 30" earlier this year, with a skinny tyre - it was harsh
compared to the Coker, but so much more manouverable.

(Why have I changed my Coker to 127mm? I’ve just been given a really nice brake
setup (anodised blue calipers and bar-end with shimano deore bar-end shifter)
and finally could trust myself going downhill with the short cranks. Uphill is
hard work, but doable with practice.)


Paul Selwood paul@vimes.u-net.com http://www.vimes.u-net.com

Re: 28 inch cruising

I rode a Coker briefly at Muni weekend with 102mm cranks (4"). Difficult to get
going, as in I couldn’t freemount even with multiple tries, but once riding,
it’s really smooth. If there are any downhills, LOOK OUT! I’ve ridden a 28"
wheel with 4" cranks and that seemed great.

—Nathan

“Roger Davies” <Roger.Davies@Octacon.Co.Uk> wrote in message
news:004901c03d2d$a6477f20$2c4efe3e@p400
> 110 cranks on a coker are great :slight_smile: This is what I used and love them, they
> make the Coker even smoother than normal.
>
> Roger
> -------------------------------------------------
> The UK’s Unicycle Source http://www.unicycle.uk.com/
> -------------------------------------------------
> ----- Original Message ----- From: “Peter Nyflot” <peter-nyflot@bethel.edu>
> To: “Unicycle Mailing List” <unicycling@winternet.com> Sent: Monday, October
> 23, 2000 8:50 PM Subject: Re: 28 inch cruising
>
>
> >
> > >Rather than buy another Coker wheel for my road riding, I’m thinking of
> > getting
> > >a 28 inch wheel with short cranks. I know that this used to be the
> standard
> > >road-riding setup. What length cranks do people prefer–is 125 too
short?
> > How
> > >much of a come-down will this setup be–after being used to a Coker?
> >
> >
> > On UAM most of the people riding 28" unis had between 114 and 102mm
> cranks.
> > I rode on 114 and would of rather had shorter cranks. I’d say find a
good
> > wheelbuilder and stick with your coker. It’s faster and smother and
easer
> > on the rider.
> >
> > Peter
> >