![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Not "2" Tired
Join Date: Aug 2006
Age: 57
Posts: 13,541
|
WOw! I just got a loaner coker from a friend who has two, so that's really cool and now I'll have a 36-er to use 'till I get my own! But here's what I've noticed very quickly; This loaner is an original coker w/steel rim, which was just trued and spins beautifully.
John (Vivalargo) also has a basic coker but with an (older) airfoil and the same coker tire as my loaner. He uses the prowheel 127mm alum. cranks and when I rode it, It was smooth, nimble and got up to speed quickly. It is a joy to ride. On *This* loaner, with the steel rim and coker tire, and 127mm *steel* cranks (couldn't find any alum. 127's locally) with no "q" factor like the Prowheels, I immediately noticed that it was MUCH harder to get this coker up to speed, and overall it just felt sluggish. So my question is, do you think it *soley* because of the steel rim and or the steel cranks vs John's setup? The conditions were basically the same, on flat ground with little or no wind. I also noticed that when I *did* hit a hilly section, that it was more difficult to climb, compared to John's coker. thoughts?
Last edited by MuniAddict; 2007-06-06 at 09:09 PM. |
|
|
|
| Tags |
| coker, observation, rim or cranks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| A Picture game. Or, maybe just an observation. | Fuego | Just Conversation & Introduce Yourself | 28 | 2006-05-22 09:29 PM |
| Unexperienced mounter observation... | Jax | General Unicycling Discussions | 4 | 2003-06-14 11:38 PM |
| A pedal observation | JJuggle | General Unicycling Discussions | 2 | 2003-06-11 10:39 AM |
| crank length observation | Klaas Bil | General Unicycling Discussions | 0 | 2002-11-24 12:53 AM |
| observation on hopping | Jeff Lutkus | General Unicycling Discussions | 1 | 2001-10-14 11:07 AM |