Unicyclist Community

home gallery forums webmail links map donate
Go Back   Unicyclist Community > Unicycling Discussion > General Unicycling Discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 2010-04-06, 10:09 PM   #1
Myrninerest
Registered User
 
Myrninerest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Stroud, UK
Age: 24
Posts: 80
Send a message via AIM to Myrninerest Send a message via MSN to Myrninerest
26er with a 3.0 slick tyre vs. 29er

Hello!

I have a dilemma: I own a lovely 26" Muni, but I've just sold my 36er and I'd like a smaller, more manageable unicycle for medium distances on the road. My plan is to get a 29er with short cranks and keep the 26" for Muni with 125/150 cranks.

What I'd like to know is this: is there a significant difference between a 26er with a 26x3.0 tyre and a 29er with a 2.35 tyre? Is it a worthwhile investment to get a 29er, or should I just buy a road tyre?

If there is a difference, is it significant?

Thanks!
__________________
I put on my shoes and grab my key for the door; put my headphones on for this world I ignore.
Myrninerest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-04-06, 11:53 PM   #2
siafirede
Flex Your Head
 
siafirede's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Age: 28
Posts: 2,291
Quote:
Originally Posted by Myrninerest View Post
Hello!

I have a dilemma: I own a lovely 26" Muni, but I've just sold my 36er and I'd like a smaller, more manageable unicycle for medium distances on the road. My plan is to get a 29er with short cranks and keep the 26" for Muni with 125/150 cranks.

What I'd like to know is this: is there a significant difference between a 26er with a 26x3.0 tyre and a 29er with a 2.35 tyre? Is it a worthwhile investment to get a 29er, or should I just buy a road tyre?

If there is a difference, is it significant?

Thanks!
26x3.0 is going to feel very sluggish compared to a 29 x 2.x big apple, i'd recommend the 2.0 tire, as most seem to agree it is a better road tire than the 2.35, but I used the 2.35 and didnt have any real issues.

29er with big apple 2.0/2.35 and 110mm cranks or something similar will be a lot smoother and faster on the road than a 26x3.0 or 26 with a muni tire.
__________________
-James

Last edited by siafirede; 2010-04-06 at 11:54 PM.
siafirede is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-04-07, 12:03 AM   #3
jtrops
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Longmont, Colorado
Age: 45
Posts: 1,286
As far as I know you'll be the first to try a 26x3.0 Fireball on a uni. I look forward to hearing how it handles for you. It might be just the ticket.
__________________
"A properly ridden unicycle is like an object in orbit: constantly falling but never landing." -Diogenes
jtrops is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-04-07, 05:10 AM   #4
saskatchewanian
ERIC P
 
saskatchewanian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Denare Beach, Saskatchewan, Canada
Age: 27
Posts: 5,244
Send a message via MSN to saskatchewanian Send a message via Skype™ to saskatchewanian
26x3 is heavy heavy heavy. I think you would be much happier if you went down to something in the 2.0 to 2.5 range. I have a 26x2.5 Hookworm on a wheel I use for cruising around town (with 114mm cranks) and it works great for those shorter rides.

I recently built up a 29 with a 2.1" tire and the whole unicycle is over 2kg lighter than my 26 with 3.0 tire. The weight difference is very noticeable.
__________________
My friends, love is better than anger. Hope is better than fear. Optimism is better than despair. So let us be loving, hopeful and optimistic. And we’ll change the world. - Jack Layton
saskatchewanian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-04-07, 10:16 AM   #5
r7ll
Cookie Monster
 
r7ll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Oxford, UK
Age: 24
Posts: 62
The alternative is to try and fit a 29" wheel in your 26" frame... I tried putting my friend's 29x2.35" on my 26" frame, and it was about 1.5cm from being able to fit. You might succeed with a thinner 29" tyre?
r7ll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-04-07, 02:44 PM   #6
Myrninerest
Registered User
 
Myrninerest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Stroud, UK
Age: 24
Posts: 80
Send a message via AIM to Myrninerest Send a message via MSN to Myrninerest
I doubt I'd be able to fit a 29" tyre into the frame; there's only barely clearance for the 26x3.0 tyre I have on there right now. I suppose it may be possible (and I like the idea) but it could be a moderately expensive mistake...

jtrops: If I do get a slick, I'll be using the Kenda Flame 3.0 tyre. As the others have said, though, it would be very heavy. I'm concerned about the weight making the uni too cumbersome for quick town, city and road riding.

I'm going on a 25 mile ride with some cyclists (Scouts completing their cycling badge) later this month, so I need the uni to be up to that and able to keep decent speed. From the posts here, it sounds like a 29er would fit the bill better than a 26er. It sounds like the main issue is weight and handling rather than wheel circumference and thus speed – is that right?

Thanks!
__________________
I put on my shoes and grab my key for the door; put my headphones on for this world I ignore.
Myrninerest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2010-04-07, 03:03 PM   #7
jtrops
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Longmont, Colorado
Age: 45
Posts: 1,286
Quote:
Originally Posted by Myrninerest View Post
I doubt I'd be able to fit a 29" tyre into the frame; there's only barely clearance for the 26x3.0 tyre I have on there right now. I suppose it may be possible (and I like the idea) but it could be a moderately expensive mistake...

jtrops: If I do get a slick, I'll be using the Kenda Flame 3.0 tyre. As the others have said, though, it would be very heavy. I'm concerned about the weight making the uni too cumbersome for quick town, city and road riding.

I'm going on a 25 mile ride with some cyclists (Scouts completing their cycling badge) later this month, so I need the uni to be up to that and able to keep decent speed. From the posts here, it sounds like a 29er would fit the bill better than a 26er. It sounds like the main issue is weight and handling rather than wheel circumference and thus speed – is that right?

Thanks!
If I was going on a 25 mile ride with bikes I would want a 36'er. The 29 is a versatile size, but it doesn't begin to be as fast as bikes. Maybe someone in your area will let you borrow a Coker for the ride. If you were around here I'd be happy to lend you mine.
__________________
"A properly ridden unicycle is like an object in orbit: constantly falling but never landing." -Diogenes
jtrops is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
26er, 29er, slick, tyre


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Feeler: trade KH 29er with Magura Brakes ckayakr Trading Post 0 2010-02-04 05:00 AM
Bontrager 29er tyre andytait Unicycle Product Reviews 0 2006-06-01 01:34 PM
slick 36er tyre/tire smdO2 General Unicycling Discussions 21 2005-02-24 07:56 AM
Fatti-O 24x3.0 slick tyre. hole-in-my-shoe General Unicycling Discussions 2 2004-01-29 01:36 AM
26er vs. 29er... help! daino149 General Unicycling Discussions 6 2004-01-22 04:57 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001-2005 Gilby
Page generated in 0.07248 seconds with 12 queries